So, one of the things you have to do before they implant* (bwahhhahhah!) blastocycst in your womb,is make a bunch of decisions, and initial a bunch of boxes.
Last week over a romantic dinner, I brought up said boxes, one of which was what to do with the (hopefully) excess frozen blastocysts** . I hadn't thought about it, and just assumed that donating them to stem cell research would be a no-brainer, and not much of a conversation. But as we started to talk about it, it turned out we had very different thought processes going on about this issue.
My position, at the beginning at least, was that it was as if we were putting a child up for adoption, and that we would become genetic parents (b/c if it grows in some other woman's body, she is the birthing mother...oy so much to keep straight!), and that I didn't think I could bear to carry that around with me. My husband, who is much more generous and loving than I am, argued that if anyone knows the pain of infertility, its us, and we could help someone out, why shouldn't we. I was really surprised at how passionate he was about this, and how afraid I was that the child would come back and demand to know why we kept blast's A and B, but 'got rid of' C-H. How was I supposed to answer that? I didn't know it was you? You were at the far end of the dish? And then I found myself convinced that they would be hurt in ways in which I'm terrified my own children will be hurt (read: Worried they'll suffer the same losses I've been slogging through in therapy all these years), and that I couldn't forgive myself if I wasn't there to protect them. It is interesting to me that they were blastocysts I was willing to give them to science, to obliterate them for their cells, but as soon as they implanted in another woman and divided and became real living breathing humans, they were my babies. My husband and I trudged though all of that without coming to any conclusion, however we did get to the point of imagining them finding us, and seeing the blasts-to-humans that stayed with us as not having gotten such a good deal, and running screaming back to their families of birth.
I remember when I was 25 it occurred to me that I had made it out of adolescence without getting pregnant, that I could relax about that being something to deal with. The idea of putting up our blastocysts for adoption put me in the role of birth/genetic mother, and it freaked me out. Really, what I would be is a birth other. Birth other is a term that psychologist Dianne Ehrensaft came up with to describe persons involved in the child-making-process (surrogates, egg donors, sperm donors). I've done some preliminary thinking about using an egg donor, and adopting, and even adopting an embryo. Essentially I can easily imagine myself on the receiving end, but not on the giving end. I know it is my decision, and it has to reflect my comfort levels and all that, but essentially I feel like a small, greedy, fearful person because I can't easily imagine giving in this way.
When I was a child I was always making comparisons between myself and my family members, looking for signs, looking for similarities. Sometimes I wanted them as predictors of the future, sometimes as a way to feel connected. I know that part of this was because of the disconnected feeling in my family; I was always looking for ways to know I belonged. But this is how the wind blew, and this is how I grew, and for the moment I can indulge my desire for genetic connection to my hoped for children. My husband feels that your family is the family that raised you, and that is the end of it. I know that is true as well; my cousin and I don't need any genetic connection to clean a kitchen in the same way, or to trim strawberries, but it is there. In her book The Mistress's Daughter A.M. Homes describes going through her dead birth mother's apartment and finding money wadded up in her birth mothers handbag, just as she carried her own money. Her mother was always chiding her for this habit, but it came as easily as breathing--it is a sensibility, a way of being that transcended her upbringing. I love looking at pictures of my father's mother and seeing 'my eyes' and even knowing that she was a 'nervous nelly' gave me comfort as a child--this isn't just me, its a way of being that they recognize from someone else. I don't know if our children will have that hunger, certainly my husband doesn't, but I feel distressed about creating that for another.
This is another one of those things about infertility, you have to think about so much, and it is so intensely personal. When you get pregnant, even with a modicum of trying, certain things just fall by the wayside, and this is clearly one of them.
Perhaps I'm putting the cart before the horse. In the end our decision is to wait and see how we feel, and to wait and see if we actually have any blastocysts at all, any to share.
* For those of you new to the world of infertility, the news media and television shows almost always refer to the act of transferring a blastocycst into the uterus and 'implanting." That is, of course, what you want it to do, but the act of transferring does not an implantation make.
**I'm turning into a regular Derrida with the all the foot noting! Ok, back to the reason for the footnote: This specific program wouldn't be a match for us in either direction, we're a secular-humanist-jewish family, so I don't think any right-to-lifers would pick us for their babies. We'd have to go private.